top of page

Seems strange that any organization would resist the input of others. Especially when input is backed with verification and examples of fact. Some preceive speaking out as a threat and will go to extream measures to make certain that such is surpressed to the point of attempting to alter history or shall one say encouraging to distant themselves from the messenger to assure the current nerritive is maintained.

 

Is this the democracy of governing that should be utilized?

 

It must be reiterated this site for sure exists not for wishing to gain popularity but rather something much larger. The love of a club founder that sincerely wishes the club to again be healthy with a large membership composed of a balance of the younger, the seniors and returned to a time of being a nationally recognized and competitive club by having a strong club membership and a set of officers that once in office will perform the full responsibility of that office and not just take up space. Why that concept is not well received and not an honorable goal remains an unknown.

 

 

Questions regarding total transparency and suggestions offered here are just as any others only in a public forum rather than the preferred discrete method therefore is frowned upon and if another point of view is offered publicly serves as a threat to some.

 

The only request is that equal consideration be offered to all. Have any changes been observed of late? Have you been curious why? Painful to witness a very select few ever so slowly reducing the club as once was a club spin off that shares some common names as today and has long been forgotten.

 

 

 

Please know your club history and PLEASE do not allow history to repeat itself.

bottom of page